- Home>
- Uncategorized>
- Comprehensive Guide: How to understand what your customers need based on qualitative interviews
Understanding customer needs is crucial for any business aiming to create products or services that truly resonate with their target audience. Qualitative interviews provide rich, detailed insights into customer experiences, preferences, and pain points. However, the real challenge lies in extracting meaningful, actionable needs from these conversations.
At my company FunnelBud, we recently did such a study, which has resulted in a clear understanding of who our customers are and what they need. It will allow us to market effectively to the right people, and build a feature roadmap that we believe will truly resonate with our customers.
We learned a lot during this research. In this post, I’d like to share publicly what we learned – as we found these lessons truly valuable. Hopefully, by reading this, you can also benefit by understanding how to find out what your customers actually want.
This post will assume that you’ve already interviewed your customers, and we’ll not go through the actual interview methodology or which questions to ask. In our view, there are a lot of methodologies already covering this. However, we didn’t find any satisfactory way to actually interpret the interviews that would work for us. So in this post, we’ll guide you through a deep understaning of:
We’ve been heavily inspired by Strategyn and their Jobs to be Done methodology, but adapted it for a smaller company with less resources. Read more about their formal methodology at: https://strategyn.com/.
When talking to customers, they’ll often state problems they have, things they like or don’t like about your solution, things they like about competitors, or things they’d like you to develop. None of these things are needs. They are perhaps:
Neither of these things can be used effectively to understand who your customers truly are, segment them, and innovate solutions that will deeply satisfy them.
The reason is, in short, if you do so, you’ll just be a copycat or you’ll “build a faster horse”.
In order to win in the marketplace we need to precisely understand the factors that define the segment that we are best fit to serve, why we are best fit to serve that segment (the needs we are best equipped to satisfy), and how to innovate to serve those needs better than anybody else.
The starting point is to understand the underlying needs behind all those different types of statements that our customers provide in interviews. This is crucial because:
By concentrating on needs, we avoid putting the burden of innovation on the customer. While customers are experts in knowing what they’re trying to achieve, it’s our expertise and our role to solve those needs. We can do so much better than our customers – otherwise we shouldn’t be in this market. This approach prevents us from merely “building faster horses” and opens up possibilities for true innovation.
The challenge lies in extracting those needs from whatever customers tell us, and encoding them effectively. What should we look for in the answers, and how do we uncover the underlying needs behind what customers say?
– “It’s hard to make straight lines” → Easily cut straight lines
– “I’m trying to cut wood indoors” → (Context for understanding the specific group’s needs)
– “I hate when there’s debris everywhere” → Minimize the amount of debris when sawing
Customer: “I want ready-made templates that I can use to launch customer campaigns”
→ Why: “Because it’s time-consuming”
→ Need: Quickly build customer campaigns
Our better innovation: “AI that asks you what your campaign should achieve, then builds a draft for you that you can edit”
Our goal is to extract the thing from customer statements that allow us to:
We’ll call this “thing” that we extract a need. Thus, the definition of a need would need to satisfy these requirements:
To test if you’ve extracted a true need, check it against these criteria. If it’s still not clear, you can look at the goal – why are we trying to extract needs in the first place – and ask yourself if the thing you extracted allows you to reach those goals. Otherwise, ask “why” to dig deeper into the underlying need.
When formulating a need, you have the opportunity to make it more or less generalized and abstract. By asking “why” multiple times, you will get higher level and more abstract needs. The challenge is to know when to stop – i.e. how specific a need should be.
Deeper needs allow for more innovation but may be less tangible to customers.
Shallower needs are more immediately recognizable but may limit innovation.
The right level depends on runrate. If you have a long runrate, you can afford to spend considerable amounts on more revolutionary innovations that satisfy more fundamental needs.Stop at a level where you can innovate a solution within your desired timeframe and ROI expectations.
While Strategyn insists on a specific format ([Direction] [something measurable] [verb] [context]), we find that for our purposes, we don’t need to be that specific. Instead, we give two options:
A) Natural language method
Format: ([Easily and/or Quickly]) [verb / know that / ensure that] [something is done / achieved]
Example 1: “Easily send a message to a customer”
Example 2: “Easily and quickly know that your customer received your message”
Example 3: “Ensure that a salesperson can gain access to the customer list”
B) Strategyn method
Format: [Direction] [something measurable] [verb] [context]
Example 1: “Minimize the amount of debris when cutting a wood”
Example 2: “Maximize the likelihood that the cut gets completed”
Example 3: “Minimize the time it takes to log in to the software”
Choose the formulation that makes the need easy to understand and unambiguous.
You will now have a list of consistently formulated needs across all customers.
It’s helpful to put this in a sheet with customers in columns and needs in rows. You can then proceed to group needs based on causal factors they might have in common. Here’s an example of how that might look:
With this in hand, you are now equipped to proceed with segmenting your customers based on which needs they have expressed, and hypothesizing unique customer segments based on which needs they have and what factors cause them to have these needs.
Here’s an example of how that might look:
This will be a subjective, iterative process. We recommend spending quite a lot of time creating different hypotheses and testing them against actual needs that the customers have, who those customers are, and what they said.
After doing this, it is likely that you’ll end up with clear cut customer segments, differentiated by factors that both describe the segments, and explain why they have the needs that they have.
Choose which segments to serve based on:
Use Porter’s “Competitive Strategy” book, “What is strategy” article, and “Understanding Michael Porter” book for guidance on strategic decisions.
By following this methodology, you’ll be able to extract meaningful customer needs from interview transcripts, allowing you to develop more targeted and effective solutions. Remember, the key is to focus on the underlying needs rather than just the stated problems or requested solutions. This approach will guide your innovation efforts and help you create products that truly address your customers’ most important needs. Focus on the right needs for a segment you can serve effectively, and you’ll have a long-term roadmap for both product innovation and marketing that will allow you to create a sustainable, profitable company that your chosen group of customers love.